The Top SIEM solutions and how to select them are the best SIEM solutions.
Top SIEM solutions
Discover the top SIEM solutions and how they can protect your business. SIEM systems aggregate security incidents, making them essential to cybersecurity. Anyone curious in SIEM security solutions or their importance in cybersecurity should read this article. The primary benefits of utilising SIEM systems will be covered, along with some of the leading SIEM suppliers and the reasons behind the distinctiveness of their offerings.
Splunk
One well-liked SIEM solution is Splunk. Its ability to manage application and network monitoring use cases in addition to security is what distinguishes it from other providers. Because of this, it is well-liked by both IT operations users and security specialists. Splunk’s SIEM, like the majority of the best SIEM systems, offers real-time information and a somewhat intuitive user interface. Workload protection determines pricing.
However, Splunk Enterprise Security’s limited automation and integrated behavioral analytics capabilities make it difficult to identify sophisticated attacks and tactics like lateral movement. The solution cannot be utilized “out of the box” and has to be heavily customized for the majority of organizations to be effective. A specialized user must execute several specific queries in order to identify lateral movement, which might lead to a high number of false positives. Another issue that consumers mention is the absence of cross-product integration between SIEM, SOAR, and UEBA.
LogRhythm
As a SIEM pioneer, LogRhythm has established a strong name for itself. Along with AI and log correlation, LogRythm’s solution also includes a number of analytical tools. Although LogRhythm integration is comparatively easy, there is a higher learning curve because it is not as user-friendly as other SIEMs.
Furthermore, not all lateral movement can be automatically detected by LogRhythm’s solution. In order to identify account switching, researchers must manually merge several dates. This is dangerous because attackers frequently travel laterally across your network in an attempt to find assets or important information. The detection engine of the solution struggles to identify sophisticated threats and is heavily reliant on indications of compromise (IOCs).
Additionally, a recent Gartner Magic Quadrant analysis pointed out that LogRhythm’s cloud-based SIEM product has a number of shortcomings.
IBM QRadar SIEM
You can see your IT infrastructure in real time with IBM QRadar SIEM. Its modular design makes threat identification and prioritization easier. It provides high-end analytics, a range of configuration-side options, and support for numerous logging protocols. Customers may download more IBM and third-party content for QRadar through the app store provided by the solution.
The comparatively high cost (and intricate pricing structure) and the need for collaborative capabilities like chat tools and better asset management are some of IBM QRadar’s disadvantages. Furthermore, QRadar lacks UEBA capabilities, a fundamental part of next-generation SIEM.
Additional disadvantages include the fact that there is sometimes little product support (although you may buy enhanced support) and that updates in dispersed systems can be difficult and time-consuming. The product’s limited reporting features require externally written scripts to be used in conjunction with them.
Azure Sentinel by Microsoft
It is popular with clients that wish to centralize their Microsoft IT and security costs. Additionally, it provides a distinctive “pay-as-you-go” license approach that may appeal to major corporations while still satisfying the financial needs of SMBs. Another well-known feature of Azure Sentinel is their seamless data onboarding procedure.
Azure Sentinel does have some significant disadvantages, though. Their approach to security is particularly Microsoft-centric, and compared to other top SIEMs, they have less third-party connectors with security companies. Because of this, they are not a desirable option for businesses that use security tools that are not made by Microsoft. For security analysts who are not familiar with Microsoft data sources, there will also be a significant learning curve.
Securonix
Analyst firms have given Securonix’s robust SIEM solution a high ranking. Their technology has analytics-driven UEBA engine and next-generation SIEM features. Additionally, they promote their deployment collaborations with Snowflake and AWS. Securonix provides clients with the option to acquire vertical-specific material through “Premium Apps,” which include packages for fraud, aeronautical analytics, etc., in addition to their unconventional policies and models.
Customers should be informed, nonetheless, that Securonix does not have a native SOAR engine built in. They have previously whitelabeled a CyberSponse SOAR engine. Although Securonix now promotes a SOAR component, it is devoid of many of the features that other top SIEM providers provide in their platforms for security orchestration and automation. Another disadvantage is that, in comparison to other SIEM suppliers, Securonix offers less hot storage in their base license package.
McAfee Enterprise Security Manager
You can manage compliance-related activities, perform sophisticated threat detection, and create real-time reports using McAfee Enterprise Security Manager. New resources are made possible by the user interface to manage various emergency situations. McAfee Enterprise Security Manager may be set up on-site or in the cloud, and its scalability can be adjusted to meet your data needs.
Logs from many sources are gathered by McAfee Enterprise Security Manager, which can greatly increase network traffic. Logging is one known issue; the system only keeps the most important parts of the logs, which may lead to logs being gathered again to view complete event contexts.
Slow performance has been reported by certain McAfee users. Regular pop-up windows may cause interruptions from system prompts, and frequent upgrades may affect continuity.
LogPoint
A SIEM called LogPoint makes it easier to manage application events and improves application security. It is very scalable and covers the majority of security and monitoring use cases. Depending on your requirements, you may grow from one server to thousands, or the other way around.
Any environment, including development, production, and testing, may use LogPoint. It makes it easier to store, search, filter, trace errors, and create reports using log analysis. This speeds up the detection and investigation of security concerns.
Users’ reports The user interface of LogPoint lacks intuitiveness, and many functionalities are hard to locate. For instance, Alert Rules, which is concealed in the Knowledge Base part of the Settings menu, provides access to alert setups.
The query language, which is flexible but has a high learning curve and can be challenging to use, is another possible disadvantage for users. UEBA setup can be difficult and time-consuming, and the required information is not always readily available. Because of this, it is a less good choice for companies without highly technical employees.
Elastic Stack
Elastic created the ELK stack, a monitoring and log management solution that integrates with Kibana, Logstash, and Elasticsearch. Logs may be searched and filtered using Elasticsearch. Logstash makes it easier to create and gather logs in one place, in real time. Charts, graphs, and other visual representations of statistics are supported by Kibana.
These open-source technologies make it possible to administer and monitor applications effectively. Applications may be centrally recorded using the ELK stack, enabling you to promptly detect and fix problems and guarantee proper operation. It is used by organizations to identify IT problems early on so that the security team can take quick action.
The inability to integrate third-party tools, the difficulty of setting up and managing projects (because of the multiplex design), and out-of-memory problems for queries with huge index sizes are some of ELK’s disadvantages. Learning to use ELK requires a great deal of expertise and trial and error because it is also known to have inadequate documentation and be challenging to troubleshoot.
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager
If you are prepared to invest in creating the required tools, ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager is renowned to be simple to set up and maintain (at least initially) and to give a wide range of options. Action triggers, correlation, and a normalization feature are some of its potent features.
However, extracting logs might take a while, and ArcSight can be sluggish when installing big environments. Additionally, it has a complicated backend, therefore competent SIEM experts may be needed for effective maintenance, particularly if you need to create relevant event categories.
InsightIDR
InsightIDR provides pre-built alerts and triggers, as well as unconventional capabilities. By bringing various data sources together, it makes security experts’ jobs easier. It still provides on-premise log collectors, but it takes a cloud-forward strategy.
The fact that searching raw logs can be laborious and time-consuming is a significant disadvantage of InsightIDR. In order to expedite detection, teams frequently depend on established on-host log reviews. Additionally, it lacks a seamless incident management user interface, which makes gathering contextual information about security occurrences more difficult.
Furthermore, there aren’t many connectors with InsightIDR. In contrast to one of SIEM’s primary value propositions, which is to serve as a single repository for all security data within the company, the solution integrates with other Rapid7 solutions and certain third-party providers.