Page Content

Tutorials

Merkelized Abstract Syntax Trees MAST Blockchain Benefits

MAST Blockchain

MAST Blockchain
MAST Blockchain

A data structure utilized in blockchain technology, Merkelized Abstract Syntax Trees (MAST) are mainly intended to increase the effectiveness, confidentiality, and adaptability of intricate transaction scripts and smart contracts. Abstract Syntax Trees (ASTs) and Merkle Trees are two fundamental ideas that are combined in MAST Blockchain.

What MAST Combines

Abstract Syntax Trees (ASTs): An AST eliminates extraneous elements like punctuation to express the syntactic structure of code, such as the logic of a smart contract or transaction. Variables, operators, and conditional statements are examples of code constructs that are represented by nodes in an AST, while their interactions are represented by edges.

For instance, an AST with the ‘if’ condition as the root and the ‘then’ and ‘otherwise’ branches as its offspring may be found in a straightforward if/else statement in a smart contract. For transactions, Bitcoin uses a stack-based language called Script, and languages like Miniscript are designed to organize intricate Bitcoin scripts.

Merkle Trees: Large datasets can be securely and effectively verified with a Merkle tree, a hash-based data structure. Transaction conditions and scripts are examples of specific data inputs that are hashed and positioned at the “leaves” (bottom nodes) of a Merkle tree. Combining and rehashing the hashes of each pair of child nodes yields a parent node value.

This procedure continues until the Merkle root the highest hash value is achieved. The Merkle root changes with every data or hash change in the tree, ensuring data integrity. The Merkle root summarizes all of the data in the tree. The foundation of the Ethereum and Bitcoin blockchains, this topology enables effective verification since a node simply needs to compare Merkle roots to guarantee an identical list of transactions.

How MAST Works

The Merkle tree structure is applied to the script logic itself by MAST Blockchain. Multiple conditions (e.g., “A OR B OR C” for spending funds) are broken down into a sophisticated smart contract rather than a single, huge script.

Representing Conditions: A complex smart contract containing several conditions (for example, “A OR B OR C” where A, B, and C are distinct ways to spend money) is used in place of a single, big script. In a Merkle tree, every possible expenditure condition or line of reasoning becomes a “leaf”.

Hashing Branches: Every single script (or condition) is hashed separately, and these hashes make up the Merkle tree’s leaves.

Generating Merkle Root: A single Merkle root is obtained by iteratively hashing the hashes upwards after combining them pairwise. After that, the blockchain commits to this Merkle root. In the same way that Pay To Script Hash employs “pay to a script matching this hash,” MAST Blockchain is comparable to “pay to the Merkle root’s hash.”

Spending a MAST-Enabled Transaction

The procedure for spending money locked in a MAST-enabled contract is comparable to P2SH, although it has certain significant enhancements:

Choose a Path: To spend the money, you decide the particular condition or script you wish to meet.

Reveal Only Necessary Data: You supply the data needed for the selected script to run properly (such as a signature), a Merkle path, and the script itself. Your selected script is a legitimate leaf in the Merkle tree, whose root is committed on the blockchain, according to the Merkle path, which is a sequence of intermediate hashes. We refer to this as a Merkle Proof.

Verification: Once the hash of your selected script has been rebuilt, the network can use the supplied Merkle path to confirm that it points to the Merkle root that has been committed to the blockchain. Importantly, the smart contract’s unused or unselected branches are never made public on the blockchain. Only the single performed path and the Merkle root are shown.

Benefits of MAST

For Bitcoin transactions and smart contracts, MAST Blockchain provides a number of noteworthy benefits:

Improved Privacy: It hides other possible spending circumstances and only reveals the performed condition or branch of the script. This is a big step up from old Bitcoin scripting, where you had to reveal the complete script with all of its conditions. But just utilizing MAST Blockchain can be interpreted as an attempt at privacy, which is a vulnerability that Taproot is attempting to fill for Bitcoin developers.

Smaller Transactions / Reduced Transaction Size: The transaction does not need to contain any unnecessary scripts. This drastically reduces the amount of data provided in transactions by simply disclosing the performed branch. This reduces transaction fees, frees up block space, and makes transactions more efficient and smaller. Rather of scaling linearly (O(n)), the data size scales logarithmically (O(logn)) for a contract with ‘n’ potential branches.

Enhanced Scalability: The blockchain can now support more intricate scripts without “bloating” it. MAST Blockchain enables sophisticated multisig contracts (e.g., 1 of 1000 or 20 of 200 types) by allowing for complex redemption conditions, each of which is a leaf on the Merkle tree.

Increased Flexibility for Complex Contracts: More intricate smart contracts with multiple conditions are made possible by MAST Blockchain, which would be impossible or unworkable with prior scripting limitations because of size restrictions.

Better Fungibility: MAST Blockchain can increase a coin’s fungibility by simplifying complex transactions on the blockchain, which, when using the principal spending method, frequently resemble a typical single-signature transaction.

Current Status and Taproot

The proposal for MAST was BIP-114. MAST’s ideas influenced Taproot, which was added to Bitcoin in 2021, even though MAST is not yet a standalone function. Taproot uses a new architecture to integrate privacy and efficiency characteristics similar to those of MAST. As a result, contemporary Bitcoin wallets that support Taproot already enjoy advantages similar to those of MAST, integrating MAST with Schnorr signatures to provide advantages such signature aggregation and enhanced anonymity for transactions involving multiple signatures.

Summary Table

FeatureWithout MASTWith MAST (or Taproot)
PrivacyAll conditions revealedOnly executed condition revealed
Data sizeLarger scripts on-chainSmaller, efficient scripts
ComplexityLimited by block size & feesSupports complex contracts
Agarapu Geetha
Agarapu Geetha
My name is Agarapu Geetha, a B.Com graduate with a strong passion for technology and innovation. I work as a content writer at Govindhtech, where I dedicate myself to exploring and publishing the latest updates in the world of tech.
Index